: Rainbow Sandals - Womens Premier Leather Single Layer Narrow Strap

sds

: Rainbow Sandals - Womens Premier Leather Single Layer Narrow Strap

Rainbow Sandals - Womens Premier Leather Single Layer Narrow Strap

from: Rainbow



Buyer Reviews
Average Buyer Rating:  out of 5 stars

Customer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars - Rainbows are Awesome, Good Quality, Cute, Worth the Price (Well maybe)
I love rainbows, I can been a convert for a while. You can wear them in the water (eventually without damaging them even though they are leather), and the greatest part is the completely mold to your feet so that you can wear them walking. They are SUPER comfortable and supportive and really good quality. I have had mine for like 2 years, and I am in the market for a second pair. My husband has like 3 pairs he wore all through Europe on his post college trip, still. They are all the range at colleges, and I know people of all ages who like them. They also match everything and can be casual or kinda fancy.




Customer Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Thank you for the warnings!
I almost bought a pair, but after reading the reviews, especially about the store policy, I'll buy another brand! Thank you, Amazon, for posting even the sour reviews.



Customer Rating: 2 out of 5 stars - expensive return policy
i was not pleased with the product and when I decided to return them there was a restocking fee plus and $8.00 return fee which i think is unrealistic when ordering something from the internet which I hadn't seen in person.



Customer Rating: 1 out of 5 stars - Please, beware of the hype!!
I bought these sandals b/c I had heard they were the best of the best. I am VERY disappointed with these overall. First of all, they rubbed the top of my foot until they BLED after only wearing them for two days at home!! I know that some shoes take some getting used to, but I'm not enough of a masochist to persist in even attempting to break these suckers in. I can handle a blister or too, but NOT an open sore!! Secondly, they turned my feet black, and when I walked into the bathroom after my boyfriend had finished showering, I left black dye foot prints everywhere! To top off my negative experience with Rainbows, when I went to return them after wearing them INSIDE my house for only two days as mentioned above, they told me that since there was a light imprint of my toe, they would not be able to accept them and would NOT give me my money back!! I expected much more from this company, especially since these cost about 50 bucks! I would have been willing to break them in, however my skin bleeding is a sign that a product is not for me! I bought them in the first place b/c they are supposed to last so long which is better for the environment since you don't have to keep replacing them. I do regret this decision, and hope anyone considering purchasing these knows what they are getting into! I intend to call or write the company immediately and tell them about my terrible experience with their much hyped product. So, please beware of the hype! EDIT: I received comments from people telling me I should try them again, which I had already done b/c I did not want to waste my money. I am well aware that a lot of shoes need to be broken in, and I am also aware that the skin affected by the breaking in process should heal before trying to break them in again. I stopped wearing these for a while, then as I already mentioned, started to wear them again hoping everything would work out so that my 50 dollars wasn't just washed down the drain. I covered the parts of the shoes that rubbed the upper portions of my feet, and wore them constantly for a month or so. I went for an hour long walk recently, believing they were broken in since I had gone on walks that lasted about 30 minutes several times before. I REGRET THAT WALK! I have huge blisters the size of half dollars on the balls of my feet, and had to miss a day of work b/c it was too painful to walk (I am on my feet all day at work). I will NEVER buy another pair of Rainbows, and I will NEVER think I need to butcher my feet just to get a pair of shoes to work out. I still maintain that there is a lot of hype around these sandals, and I would advise anyone considering purchasing a pair to think twice!

 Next > 
page 2 of  4
 1  2  3  4 
 


Some Celebrities

Annabeth Gish  | Sofia Vergara  | Kaori Nakatani  | Cleopatra Rota  | Laurie Chapman  | Fumiko Miura  | Jane Reeves  | Gina Ryder  | Corinna Drews  | Cheri Lacey  | Isabelle Maltese  | Eileen Fulton  | Leila Farias  | Alexandra Beres  | Cordula Reyer  | Rosanne Katon  | Joanne Mills  | Dannii Minogue  | Caroline Paterson  | Anne Chapman  | Celine Dion  | Pennelope Jimenez  | Gloria Root  | Kelly Gallagher  | Tiffany Rochelle  |



Book Shopreview



We've covered in too much detail how it's some sort of "open season" on Vonage when it comes to VoIP patents. After dealing with ridiculous and expensive patent lawsuits from companies who failed to actually innovate in the same way Vonage did, the company was pressured by Wall Street to quickly settle the various patent lawsuits filed against the company. Of course, rather than settle matters, that simply opened the door for other companies to go searching through their patent portfolios to see if there was anything they could sue Vonage over. Indeed, following those settlements it didn't take long for AT&T to dig up a patent and sue -- which was quickly settled as well. Thought things were over? No such luck. Nortel just showed up last month to sue and it took all of about a week and a half for Vonage to settle that case as well.

The Nortel case is slightly different because Vonage actually already had a patent infringement lawsuit going against Nortel, but it wasn't really initiated by Vonage. Instead, it had been initiated by a patent holding firm that Vonage bought in 2006. The end result of the settlement doesn't involve money changing hands, but just a cross licensing agreement for the patents. So what's the big lesson that Vonage and others have learned from this? It's certainly got nothing to do with innovating. It's to hoard as many patents as possible so that you have your own nuclear stockpile for when someone else sues you. Want to know why the USPTO is overwhelmed? It's not because there aren't enough examiners (as some will claim) or that there aren't enough funds. It's because the way the system now works is that you are supposed to file patents on every tiny little advancement so you can use it to protect yourself against lawsuits from everyone else. That's not about innovation. It's about waste. In the meantime, since it's still open season at Vonage, who's going to be next? There are a ton of other patents in the VoIP space that can surely be used in a lawsuit, right?

Permalink | Comments | Email This Story

Small and light enough for a shirt pocket, Samsung's Helix YX-M1 is a one-stop audio entertainment center with an XM radio, a digital music player, and room for 50 hours of tunes, but it comes up short on battery life.

This raw work-flow application isn't the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.


All marketing images and content provided by Amazon.com
Strap Narrow Layer Single Leather Premier Womens - Sandals Rainbow
Shopping  Created at Sun Sep 7 19:06:56 2008